Option-pricing method of valuing multiple classes of shares
Stock options are a popular form of compensation for early-stage companies because they are a cost-effective way to attract talented employees. Additionally, stock options offer significant motivational value, as they foster loyalty and encourage employees to focus on long-term value creation. For many entrepreneurial job seekers, stock options are an attractive incentive because they offer the potential for a sizeable payoff.
The brightest and most talented candidates will closely evaluate the stock option plans offered by potential employers. From the employee's perspective, stock options with lower exercise prices are generally more attractive because they offer a larger potential payoff.
As such, most startups prefer to set the exercise price for their stock options as low as possible, without exposing themselves to tax risk. In the article below, we review tax compliance and valuation issues related to stock options.
More specifically, we discuss the differences between certain methods used by appraisers and how they impact option pricing. By understanding these issues, companies can select an appraiser who can help them set the exercise price of their stock options as low as possible while ensuring tax compliance.
The IRS enacted Section A of the Internal Revenue Code in to regulate the tax treatment of nonqualified deferred compensation plans such as stock options. According to A , if a company issues stock options, the exercise price must be set at or above fair market value. If a stock option's exercise price is set below fair market value, then both the company and its employees could face tax penalties.
To ensure A compliance when issuing stock options, companies should obtain a business valuation from a qualified appraiser. A qualified appraiser can determine the fair market value of a company's underlying common stock by applying appropriate professional standards and IRS-approved valuation methods.
By obtaining a valuation, a company can set a reasonable exercise price for its stock options and will be protected in the event of an IRS challenge.
OPM Definition - icoqerum.web.fc2.com
Performing a valuation for A compliance purposes consists of multiple steps. First, the appraiser will determine the fair market value of the total equity of the subject company using one or more of the primary valuation approaches, which include the income approach, market approach, and asset approach.
Next, the appraiser will allocate the equity value of the company across all shareholder classes, resulting in a per-share value of the class of stock for which the stock options are being issued.
The appraiser will begin this step by selecting a forward-looking value allocation method, the most common of which are the current value method, the option pricing method OPM and the probability-weighted expected return method PWERM.
Below we discuss each method in further detail and explain why start-up companies should be cognizant of the fundamental differences between each allocation method. The current value method is applied by first calculating the equity value of the subject company on a control basis and allocating the value to each class of stock based on the rights under each share class.
While this method is easier to apply than the OPM and PWERM, it is not forward-looking. In other words, it assumes that a liquidity event occurs on the valuation date and does not take into account any future possible changes to the company's value. Due to this limitation, the current value method would not be the most appropriate allocation method to apply in valuations performed for the purpose of establishing equity compensation plans.
The OPM is a commonly used, forward-looking method for allocating a company's equity value between share classes. The OPM treats common and preferred stock as call options on the subject company's equity value, with exercise prices based on the liquidation preference of the preferred stock.
Allocating Value Among Different Classes of Equity
Under this method, if the liquidation preference exceeds the value of the funds available for distribution, then the common stock holds no value. Most appraisers use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to price call options under the OPM. While other option pricing models exist e. To apply the Black-Scholes method, the appraiser must first identify potential liquidity events or exit scenarios for the company, then determine the following inputs: The PWERM is also forward-looking and involves estimating the value of a subject company's common stock based on an analysis of future values for the company under various scenarios.
This method includes the following steps:. Under the PWERM, the appraiser must consider the rights of each shareholder class and allocate the future equity values to each share class appropriately under each scenario. The appraiser may also need to determine and assign a different discount rate to each class of shares in order to determine the probability-weighted present value for each share class.
Additional adjustments may also need to be considered for each class of shares, such as a discount for lack of control or discount for lack of marketability. In some cases, the appraiser may elect to use a range of values and dates and multiple probabilities for each possible scenario.
Options Pricing: Black-Scholes Model
While this generally requires additional, rigorous analysis, it often helps produce a more accurate valuation. A primary difference between the OPM and PWERM is that the OPM requires fewer subjective inputs, making it easier and quicker to apply. Conversely, the PWERM can be a more complex undertaking and requires a higher level of expertise.
It requires in-depth discussions with management of the subject company regarding subjective details, performing exhaustive research on outcome probabilities, and the construction of complex probability models.
Although the PWERM requires additional effort and expertise to apply than the OPM, it generally results in a more favorable and accurate valuation for early stage companies offering stock options. An often cited deficiency of the OPM is that it assumes that the future possible outcomes for early stage companies are log-normally distributed, a notion that research suggests is unrealistic.
In reality, the probabilities of future outcomes for most start-ups are heavily skewed towards failure. In other words, the OPM doesn't account for the dilution impact of future financing rounds. Due to these weaknesses, the OPM often overvalues the common stock for early stage companies, resulting in higher stock option exercise prices. In contrast, the probability distribution of future possible outcomes is generally more realistic under the PWERM.
Under this method, failure scenarios are generally assigned higher probabilities. Additionally, the PWERM accounts for future financing rounds that the subject company may require to reach an exit. As a result, the estimated value of a company's common stock is likely to be lower if the appraiser applies the PWERM as opposed to the OPM.
As previously discussed, stock options with low exercise prices are more attractive to potential employees. Therefore, it's often in a company's best interest to obtain a A valuation that applies the PWERM. Companies should consider the tax compliance issues and allocation methods discussed in this article when searching for a third-party appraiser. Before hiring a valuation firm, companies should communicate their goals and be sure that the appraiser possesses the expertise required to apply the above allocation methods and provide defensible support for their conclusions.
Valuation and Tax Issues. Resources Publications Case Studies Completed Transactions Press. Section A Compliance The IRS enacted Section A of the Internal Revenue Code in to regulate the tax treatment of nonqualified deferred compensation plans such as stock options. Current Value Method The current value method is applied by first calculating the equity value of the subject company on a control basis and allocating the value to each class of stock based on the rights under each share class.
Option Pricing Method The OPM is a commonly used, forward-looking method for allocating a company's equity value between share classes. Equity value of the subject company under each liquidity event Expected time left until each event occurs Risk-free rate of return Volatility standard deviation of historical stock prices of comparable public companies PWERM The PWERM is also forward-looking and involves estimating the value of a subject company's common stock based on an analysis of future values for the company under various scenarios.
This method includes the following steps: Differences Between the OPM and PWERM: Why Should You Care? ASK US A QUESTION.
One of our professionals will respond to your question within one business day. Please fill in a valid value for all required fields. Are you sure you want to leave this form and resume later? You must upload one of the following file types for the selected field:.
There was an error displaying the form. Please copy and paste the embed code again. Contact Us W. Site Map Legal Privacy Disclosure.
Securities offered through Montage Securities, LLC W. Identifying possible future outcomes available to the subject company e. Estimating the future equity value of the subject company under each scenario. Determining the probability of each scenario occurring. Weighting the future equity value under each scenario by its respective probability. Discounting each probability-weighted future equity value to present value.